44 2033180199
All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Journal of Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience

Sign up for email alert when new content gets added: Sign up

Assessments of subjective cognitive complaints: Whose reports should we rely on - participant versus informant?

8th World Congress on NEUROLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS

June 29-30, 2023 | London, UK

Quoc Cuong Truong

University of Waikato, New Zealand

Posters & Accepted Abstracts: J Neurol Clin Neurosci

Abstract :

Objectives: Older adults often report Subjective Cognitive Complaints (SCC), which relate to an individual’s self-experience of cognitive deterioration and contribute to the criteria for a diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment. SCC can be self-reported or reported by informants (family member or friend) who are close to the individual with the advantage of quickly and easily capturing daily cognitive and memory changes that standardized neuropsychological tests may not detect. However, no empirical examination was conducted to date using an appropriate methodology to investigate whose reports (i.e., participants' or informants') are more reliable, and at what stage researchers and clinicians should rely on which reports. The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability of two widely used SCC assessment tools, the self-reported Memory Complaint Questionnaire (MAC-Q) and the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE). Methodology: Generalizability theory was applied to SCC assessment scales using longitudinal measurement design with five assessments spanning 10 years of follow-up. Findings: The IQCODE demonstrated strong reliability in measuring enduring patterns of SCC with G=0.86. Marginally acceptable reliability of the 6- item MAC-Q (G=0.77-0.80) was optimized by removing one item resulting in G=0.80-0.81. Most items of both assessments were measuring enduring SCC with exception of one dynamic MAC-Q item. The IQCODE significantly predicted global cognition scores and risk of dementia incident across all occasions, while MAC-Q scores were only significant predictors on some occasions. Conclusion & Significance: While both informants (IQCODE) and self-reported (MAC-Q) SCC scores were generalizable across sample population and occasions, self-reported (MAC-Q) scores may be less accurate in predicting cognitive ability and diagnosis of each individual.

 
Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 500

Journal of Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience received 500 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience peer review process verified at publons
pulsus-health-tech
Top