Application of microorganisms in bioremediation-review

Received: 20-Oct-2017 Accepted Date: Dec 20, 2017; Published: 22-Dec-2017

Citation: Abatenh E, Gizaw B, Tsegaye Z, et al. Application of microorganisms in bioremediation-review Journal of Environmental Microbiology December 2017;1(1):02-09.

This open-access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits reuse, distribution and reproduction of the article, provided that the original work is properly cited and the reuse is restricted to noncommercial purposes. For commercial reuse, contact reprints@pulsus.com

Abstract

Bioremediation is a biological mechanism of recycling wastes in to another form that can use and reused by other organisms. Nowadays, the world is facing the problem of different environmental pollution. Microorganisms are essential for a key alternative solution to overcome challenges. Microorganisms are survive in all place on the biospher because of their metabolic activity is astonishing; then come into existence in all over range of environmental conditions. The nutritional capacity of microorganisms is completely varied, so it is used as bioremidation of environmental pollutants. Bioremediation is highly involved in degradation, eradication, immobilization, or detoxification diverse chemical wastes and physical hazardous materials from the surrounding through the all-inclusive and action of microorganisms. The main principle is degrading and transforming pollutants such as hydrocarbons, oil, heavy metal, pesticides, dye’s and so on. That is carried out in enzymatic way through metabolizing, so it have grate contribution role to solve many environmental problems. There are two types of factors these are biotic and abiotic conditions are determine rate of degradation. Currently, different methods and strategies are applied in the area in different part of the world. For example, biostimulation, bioaugementation, bioventing, biopiles and bioattenuation are common one. All bioremidation techniques it has its own advantage and disadvantage because it has its own specific application.

Keywords

Microorganisms; Factors; Bioremediation; Pollutants; Biodegradation; Biostimulation; Bioaugementation; Bioventing; Biopiles; Bioattenuation

Introduction

Microorganisms are widely distributed on the biosphere because of their metabolic ability is very impressive and they can easily grow in a wide range of environmental conditions. The nutritional versatility of microorganisms can also be exploited for biodegradation of pollutants. This kind of process is termed as bioremediation. It is continued through based on the ability of certain microorganisms to convert, modify and utilize toxic pollutants in order to obtaining energy and biomass production in the process [1]. Instead of simply collecting the pollutant and storing it, bioremediation is a microbiological well organized procedural activity which is applied to break down or transform contaminates to less toxic or non-toxic elemental and compound forms. Bioremediators are biological agents used for bioremediation in order to clean up contaminated sites. Bacteria, archaea and fungi are typical prime bioremediators [2]. The application of bioremediation as a biotechnological process involving microorganisms for solving and removing dangers of many pollutants through biodegradation from the environment. Bioremediation and biodegradation terms are more interchangable words. Microorganisms are act as a significant pollutant removal tools in soil, water, and sediments; mostly due to their advantage over other remediation procedural protocols. Microorganisms are restoring the original natural surroundings and preventing further pollution [3]. The aim of review to express current trend the application/role of microorganisms on bioremediation and to contribute relevant background which is identified gaps in this thematic area. Presently, it is hot research area because microorganisms are eco-friendly and promising valuable genetic material to solve environmental threats.

Factors affecting microbial bioremediation

Bioremediation is involved in degrading, removing, altering, immobilizing, or detoxifying various chemicals and physical wastes from the environment through the action of bacteria, fungi and plants. Microorganisms are involved through their enzymatic pathways act as biocatalysts and facilitate the progress of biochemical reactions that degrade the desired pollutant. Microorganisms are act against the pollutants only when they have access to a variety of materials compounds to help them generate energy and nutrients to build more cells. The efficiency of bioremediation depends on many factors; including, the chemical nature and concentration of pollutants, the physicochemical characteristics of the environment, and their availability to microorganisms [4]. The reason for rate of degradation is affected due to bacteria and pollutants do not contact each other. In addition to this, microbes and pollutants are not uniformly spread in the environment. The controlling and optimizing of bioremediation processes is a complex system due to many factors. These factors are included here: the existence of a microbial population capable of degrading the pollutants, the availability of contaminants to the microbial population and environment factors (type of soil, temperature, pH, the presence of oxygen or other electron acceptors, and nutrients).

Biological factors

A biotic factors are affect the degradation of organic compounds through competition between microorganisms for limited carbon sources, antagonistic interactions between microorganisms or the predation of microorganisms by protozoa and bacteriophages. The rate of contaminant degradation is often dependent on the concentration of the contaminant and the amount of “catalyst” present. In this context, the amount of “catalyst” represents the number of organisms able to metabolize the contaminant as well as the amount of enzymes(s) produced by each cell. The expression of specific enzymes by the cells can increase or decrease the rate of contaminant degradation. Furthermore, the extent to contaminant metabolism specific enzymes must be participated and their “affinity” for the contaminant and also the availability of the contaminant is largely needed. The major biological factors are included here: mutation, horizontal gene transfer, enzyme activity, interaction (competition, succession, and predation), its own growth until critical biomass is reached, population size and composition [5,6].

Environmental factors

The metabolic characteristics of the microorganisms and physicochemical properties of the targeted contaminants determine possible interaction during the process. The actual successful interaction between the two; however, depends on the environmental conditions of the site of the interaction. Microorganism growth and activity are affected by pH, temperature, moisture, soil structure, solubility in water, nutrients, site characteristics, redox potential and oxygen content, lack of trained human resources in this field and Physico-chemical bioavailability of pollutants (contaminant concentration, type, solubility, chemical structure and toxicity). These above listed factors are determining kinetics of degradation [5,7]. Biodegradation can occur under a wide-range of pH; however, a pH of 6.5 to 8.5 is generally optimal for biodegradation in most aquatic and terrestrial systems. Moisture influences the rate of contaminant metabolism because it influences the kind and amount of soluble materials that are available as well as the osmotic pressure and pH of terrestrial and aquatic systems [8]. Most environmental factors are listed below.

Availability of nutrients

The addition of nutrients adjusts the essential nutrient balance for microbial growth and reproduction as well as having impact on the biodegradation rate and effectiveness. Nutrient balancing especially the supply of essential nutrients such as N and P can improve the biodegradation efficiency by optimizing the bacterial C: N: P ratio. To survive and continue their microbial activities microorganisms need a number of nutrients such as carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorous. In small concentrations the extent of hydrocarbon degradation also limits. The addition of an appropriate quantity of nutrients is a favourable strategy for increasing the metabolic activity of microorganisms and thus the biodegradation rate in cold environments [9,10]. Biodegradation in aquatic environment is limited by the availability of nutrients [11]. Similar to the nutritional needs of other organisms, oil-eating microbes also require nutrients for optimal growth and development. These nutrients are available in the natural environment but occur in low quantities [12].

Temperature

Among the physical factors temperature is the most important one to determining the survival of microorganisms and composition of the hydrocarbons [13]. In cold environments such as the Arctic, oil degradation via natural processes is very slow and puts the microbes under more pressure to clean up the spilled petroleum. The sub-zero temperature of water in this region causes the transport channels within the microbial cells to shut down or may even freeze the entire cytoplasm, thus, rendering most oleophilic microbes metabolically inactive [12,14]. Biological enzymes are participated in the degradation pathway have an optimum temperature and will not have the same metabolic turnover for every temperature. Moreover, the degradation process for specific compound needs specific temperature. Temperature also speed up or slow down bioremediation process because highly influence microbial physiological properties. The rate of microbial activities increases with temperature, and reaches to its maximum level at an optimum temperature. It became decline suddenly with further increase or decrease in temperature and eventually stop after reaching a specific temperature.

Concentration of oxygen

Different organisms require oxygen others also do not require oxygen based on their requirement facilitate the biodegradation rate in a better way. Biological degradation is carried out in aerobic and anaerobic condition, because oxygen is a gaseous requirement for most living organisms. The presence of oxygen in most cases can enhance hydrocarbon metabolism [12].

Moisture content

Microorganisms require adequate water to accomplish their growth. The soil moisture content has adverse effect in biodegradation agents.

PH

PH of compound which is acidity, basicity and alkalinity nature of compound, it has its own impact on microbial metabolic activity and also increase and decrease removal process. The measurement of pH in soil could indicate the potential for microbial growth [15]. Higher or lower pH values showed inferior results; metabolic processes are highly susceptible to even slight changes in pH [16].

Site characterization and selection

Sufficient remedial investigation work must be performed prior to proposing a bioremediation remedy to adequately characterize the magnitude and extent of contamination. This work should at a minimum encompass the following factors: fully determine the horizontal and vertical extent of contamination, list the parameters and locations to be sample and the rationale for their choice, describe the methods to be used for sample acquisition and analysis to be performed.

Metal ions

Metals are important in small amount for bacteria and fungus, but in high quantity inhibit the metabolic activity of the cells. Metal compounds have direct and indirect impact on rate of degradation.

Toxic compounds

When in high concentrations of toxic nature of some contaminants can create toxic effects to microorganisms and slow down decontamination. The degree and mechanisms of toxicity vary with specific toxicants, their concentration, and the exposed microorganisms. Some organic and inorganic compounds are toxic to targeted life forms [5].

Principle of bioremediation

Bioremediation is defined as the process whereby organic wastes are biologically degraded under controlled conditions to an innocuous state, or to levels below concentration limits established by regulatory authorities. Microorganisms are suited to the task of contaminant destruction because they possess enzymes that allow them to use environmental contaminants as a food. The aim of bioremediation is encouraging them to work by supplying optimum levels of nutrients and other chemicals essential for their metabolism in order to degrade/detoxify substances which are hazardous to environment and living things. All metabolic reactions are mediated by enzymes. These belong to the groups of oxidoreductases, hydrolases, lyases, transferases, isomerases and ligases. Many enzymes have a remarkably wide degradation capacity due to their non-specific and specific substrate affinity. For bioremediation to be effective, microorganisms must enzymatically attack the pollutants and convert them to harmless products. As bioremediation can be effective only where environmental conditions permit microbial growth and activity, its application often involves the manipulation of environmental parameters to allow microbial growth and degradation to proceed at a faster rate [17].

Bioremediation is occurred naturally and encouraged with in addition of living things and fertilizers. Bioremediation technology is principally based on biodegradation. It refer to complete removal of organic toxic pollutants in to harmless or naturally occurring compounds like carbon dioxide, water, inorganic compounds which are safe for human, animal, plant and aquatic life [18]. Numerous ways and pathways have been elucidated for the biodegradation of a wide variety of organic compounds; for instance, it is completed in the presence and absence oxygen.

The advantage of bioremediation

• It is a natural process, it takes a little time, as an acceptable waste treatment process for contaminated material such as soil. Microbes able to degrade the contaminant and increase in numbers when the contaminant is present. When the contaminant is degraded, the biodegradative population become declines. The residues for the treatment are usually harmless product including water carbon dioxide and cell biomass.

• It requires a very less effort and can often be carried out on site, often without causing a major disruption of normal activities. This also eliminates the need to transport quantities of waste off site and the potential threats to human health and the environment that can arise during transportation.

• It is applied in a cost effective process as it lost less than the other conventional methods (technologies) that are used for clean-up of hazardous waste. Important method for the treatment of oilcontaminated sites [19].

• It also helps in complete destruction of the pollutants, many of the hazardous compounds can be transformed to harmless products, and this feature also eliminates the chance of future liability associated with treatment and disposal of contaminated material.

• It does not use any dangerous chemicals. Nutrients especially fertilizers added to make active and fast microbial growth. Commonly, used on lawns and gardens. Because of bioremediation change harmful chemicals into water and harmless gases, the harmful chemicals are completely destroyed [20].

• Simple, less labor intensive and cheap due to their natural role in the environment.

• Eco-friendly and sustainable [21].

• Contaminants are destroyed, not simply transferred to different environmental media.

• Nonintrusive, potentially allowing for continued site use.

• Relative ease of implementation [17].

• Effective way of remediating natural ecosystem from a number of contaminant and act as environment friendly options [22].

The disadvantage of bioremediation

• It is limited to those compounds that are biodegradable. Not all compounds are susceptible to rapid and complete degradation.

• There are some concerns that the products of biodegradation may be more persistent or toxic than the parent compound.

• Biological processes are often highly specific. Important site factors required for success include the presence of metabolically capable microbial populations, suitable environmental growth conditions, and appropriate levels of nutrients and contaminants.

• It is difficult to extrapolate from bench and pilot-scale studies to fullscale field operations.

• Research is needed to develop and engineer bioremediation technologies that are appropriate for sites with complex mixtures of contaminants that are not evenly dispersed in the environment. Contaminants may be present as solids, liquids and gases.

• It often takes longer than other treatment options, such as excavation and removal of soil or incineration.

• Regulatory uncertainty remains regarding acceptable performance criteria for bioremediation. There is no accepted definition of “clean”, evaluating performance of bioremediation is difficult.

• Requires very skilled human power (Tables 1-5) [17].

Microorganisms and Pollutants

Table 1: Microorganisms and Hydrocarbon (organic compound) interaction.

Table 2: Groups of microorganisms important for oil bioremediation.

Table 3: Representative examples of most dominate microorganisms in the involvement of dyes bioremadation.

Table 4: Microorganisms serve for utilizing heavy metals.

Table 5: Potential biological agents for pesticides.

Types of Bioremediation

There are different types of treatment technologies or techniques under bioremediation processes. The basic bioremediation methods are: Biostimulation, attenuation, augmentation, venting and piles

Bio stimulation

This kind of strategic is linked through the injection of specific nutrients at the site (soil/ground water) to stimulate the activity of indigenous microorganisms. It is focus with in the stimulation of indigenous or naturally existing bacteria and fungus community. Firstly, by supplying fertilizers, growth supplements and trace minerals. Secondly, by providing other environmental requirements like pH, temperature and oxygen to speed up their metabolism rate and pathway [7,17]. The Presence of small amount of pollutant can also act as stimulant by turning on the operons for bioremediation enzymes. This type of strategic path is most of the time continued in the addition of nutrients and oxygen to help indigenous microorganisms. These nutrients are the basic building blocks of life and allow microbes to create the basic requirement for example, energy, cell biomass and enzymes to degrade the pollutant. All of them will need nitrogen, phosphorous and carbon [5].

Bio attenuation [Natural attenuation]

Bioattenuation or natural attenuation is the eradication of pollutant concentrations from surrounding. It is carried out with in biological processes it maybe include (aerobic and anaerobic biodegradation, plant and animal uptake), physical phenomena (advection, dispersion, dilution, diffusion, volatilization, sorption/desorption), and chemical reactions (ion exchange, complexation, abiotic transformation). Terms such as intrinsic remediation or biotransformation are included within the more general natural attenuation definition [73].

When the environment is polluted with chemicals, nature can work in four ways to clean up [74]: 1) Tiny bugs or microbes that live in soil and groundwater use some chemicals for food. When they completely digest the chemicals, they can change them into water and harmless gases. 2) Chemicals can stick or sorb to soil, which holds them in place. This does not clean up the chemicals, but it can keep them from polluting groundwater and leaving the site. 3) As pollution moves through soil and groundwater, it can mix with clean water. This reduces or dilutes the pollution. 4) Some chemicals, like oil and solvents, can evaporate, which means they change from liquids to gases within the soil. If these gases escape to the air at the ground surface, sunlight may destroy them. If the natural attenuation is not quick enough or complete enough, bioremediation will be enhanced either by biostimulation or bioaugmentation.

Bio augmentation

It is one of the mechanism of biodegradation. The addition of pollutant degrading microorganisms (natural/exotic/ engineered) to augment the biodegradative capacity of indigenous microbial populations on the contaminated area this processes known as bioaugmentation. In order to rapidly increasing the natural microorganism population growth and enhance degradation that preferentially feed on the contaminants site. Microbes are collected from the remediation site, separately cultured, genetically modified and returned to the site. For convince, all essential microorganisms are found in there sites where soil and groundwater are contaminated with chlorinated ethenes, such as in tetrachloroethylene and trichloroethylene. It is used to ensure that the in situ microorganisms can totally remove and alter these contaminants to ethylene and chloride, which are non-toxic [75].

Bioaugmentation is the process of adding engineered microbes in a system which act as abioremediators in order to quickly and totally eliminate complex pollutants. Moreover, genetically modified microorganisms showing and proving that can increase the degradative efficiency of a wide range of environmental pollutant. Because of having diverse metabolic profile to change into less complex and harmless end products [76-78]. Natural species are not fast enough to break down certain compounds so to facilitate must be genetically modified through DNA manipulation; genetically engineered microbes act as break down pollutants much faster than the natural species and highly compete with the indigenous species, predators and also various abiotic factors. Genetically engineered microorganisms have shown potential for bioremediation of soil, groundwater and activated sludge, exhibiting the enhanced degrading capabilities of a broad coverage of chemical and physical pollutants [79,80].

Genetically Engineered Microorganisms (GEMS)

Genetically engineered microorganism is a microorganism whose genetic material has been already changed by applying genetic engineering techniques inspired by natural otherwise artificial genetic exchange between microorganisms. These kind of artistic work and a scientific procedure is mainly termed as recombinant DNA technology. Genetic engineering has been improved the utilization and elimination of hazardous unwanted wastes under laboratory conditions by creating genetically modified organisms [81]. Recombinant living organisms able to obtained by recombinant DNA techniques or by natural genetic material exchange between organisms. Currently able to insert the appropriate gene for the production of particular enzyme which can degrade various pollutants [82].

Genetically engineered microorganisms (GEMs) have shown potential for bioremediation applications in soil, groundwater, and activated sludge environments, exhibiting enhanced degradative capabilities encompassing a wide range of chemical contaminants. Recently, a number of opportunities forward for improving degradative performance using genetic engineering strategies. For example, rate-limiting steps in known metabolic pathways can be genetically manipulated to yield increased degradation rates, or completely new metabolic pathways can be incorporated into bacterial strains for the degradation of previously recalcitrant compounds. In GEMs four activities/strategies to be done these are: (1) modification of enzyme specificity and affinity, (2) pathway construction and regulation, (3) bioprocess development, monitoring, and control, (4) bioaffinity bioreporter sensor applications for chemical sensing, toxicity reduction, and end point analysis. Essential genes of bacteria are carried on a single chromosome but genes specifying enzymes required for the catabolism of some of these unusual substrates may be carried on plasmids. Plasmids have been implicated in the catabolism. Therefore, GEMs can be used effectively for biodegradation purpose and leads to represent/indicate a research frontier with broad implications in the future time [83].

Advantage of GEMs in bioremediation

The major function is speed up the recovery of waste polluted sites, increase substrate degradation, displays a high catalytic or utilization capacity with a small amount of cell mass, crate safe and purified environmental conditions by decontamination or neutralizing any harmful substances.

Disadvantage of GEMs in bioremediation

The major drawbacks are never carried out in traditional procedure, in some case the death of cells are happened, having challenge associated with their release in the surrounding, In a particular level it showed that delay of growth and substrate degradation, seasonal variation and other abiotic factor fluctuation have direct and indirect impact and relationship on microbial activity; finally, introduced foreign modified strain to the system leads to unreacted and cause unmeasurable adverse effect on the natural structural and functional microorganism’s community composition and occurrence.

Bioventing

Bioventing is involved in venting of oxygen through soil to stimulate growth of natural or introduced bacteria and fungus in the soil by providing oxygen to existing soil microorganisms; indeed, it is functional in aerobically degradable compounds. Bioventing uses low air flow rates to provide only enough oxygen to sustain microbial activity. Oxygen is most commonly supplied through direct air injection into residual contamination in soil by means of wells. Adsorbed fuel residuals are biodegraded, and volatile compounds also are biodegraded as vapors move slowly through biologically active soil. Effective bioremediation of petroleum contaminated soil using bioventing has been proved by many researchers [84,85].

Biopiles

Biopiles is a way of excavated soil contaminated with aerobically remediable hydrocarbons, can be treated in "biopiles". Biopiles (also known as biocells, bioheaps, biomounds, and compost Piles) are used to reduce concentrations of petroleum pollutants in excavated soils during the time of biodegradation. In this process, air is supplied to the biopile system during a system of piping and pumps that either forces air into the pile under positive pressure or draws air through the pile under negative pressure [86]. The microbial activity is enhanced through microbial respiration then the result in degradation of adsorbed petroleum pollutant became high [87,88].

Conclusion

Biodegradation is very fruitful and attractive option to remediating, cleaning, managing and recovering technique for solving polluted environment through microbial activity. In the future in the area researchers should be explore novel species which have grate potential. The speed of unwanted waste substances degradation is determined in competition with in biological agents, inadequate supply with essential nutrient, uncomfortable external abiotic conditions (aeration, moisture, pH, temperature), and low bioavailability of the pollutant. Due to these factors, biodegradation in natural condition is not more successful leads to be less favorable. As bioremediation can be effective only where environmental conditions permit microbial growth and activity. Bioremediation has been used in different sites globally within varying degrees of success. Mainly, the advantages are greater than that of disadvantages which is evident by the number of sites that choose to use this technology and its increasing popularity through time. Generally, different species are explored from different sites and they are effective in control way.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have not declared any conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Ethiopian Biodiversity Institute and my colleague to provide support and opportunity to work this review.

REFERENCES

1. Tang CY, Criddle QS Fu CS, Leckie JO. Effect of flux (trans membrane pressure) and membranes properties on fouling and rejection of reverse osmosis and nano filtration membranes treating perfluorooctane sulfonate containing waste water. J Enviro Sci Tech. 2007;41:2008-14.
2. Strong PJ, Burgess JE. Treatment methods for wine-related ad distillery wastewaters: a review. Biorem J. 2008;12(2):70-87.
3. Demnerova K, Mackova M, Spevakova, V, et al. Two approaches to biological decontamination of groundwater and soil polluted by aromatics characterization of microbial populations. International Microbiology. 2005;8:205-11.
4. El Fantroussi S, Agathos SN. Is bioaugmentation a feasible strategy for pollutant removal and site remediation? Curr Opin Microbiol. 2005;8:268-75.
5. Madhavi GN, Mohini DD. Review paper on – Parameters affecting bioremediation. International journal of life science and pharma research. 2012;2(3):77-80.
6. Boopathy R. Factors limiting bioremediation technologies. Bioresour Technol. 2000;74:63-7.
7. Adams GO, Fufeyin PT, Okoro SE, et al. Bioremediation, Biostimulation and Bioaugmention: A Review. International Journal of Environmental Bioremediation & Biodegradation. 2015;3(1):28-39.
8. Cases I, de Lorenzo V. Genetically modified organisms for the environment: stories of success and failure and what we have learned from them. International microbiology. 2005;8:213-22.
9. Couto N, Fritt-Rasmussen J, Jensen PE, et al. Suitability of oil bioremediation in an Artic soil using surplus heating from an incineration facility. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2014;21(9):6221-7.
10. Phulia V, Jamwal A, Saxena N, et al. Technologies in aquatic bioremediation. Kumar P, Zaki BMSA, Chauhan A, editors. Freshwater ecosystem and xenobiotics. Discovery Publishing House PVT. Ltd.:India; 2013; pp. 65-91.
11. Thavasi R, Jayalakshmi S, Banat IM. Application of biosurfactant produced from peanut oil cake by Lactobacillus delbrueckii in biodegradation of crude oil. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(3):3366-72.
12. Macaulay BM. Understanding the behavior of oil-degrading micro-organisms to enhance the microbial remediation of spilled petroleum. Appl Ecol Environ Res. 2015;13(1):247-62.
13. Das N, Chandran P. Microbial degradation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants: An overview. Biotechnol Res Int. 2011;1-13.
14. Yang SZ, Jin HJ, Wei Z, et al. Bioremediation of oil spills in cold environments: A review. Pedosphere. 2009;19(3):371-81.
15. Enim AE. Factors that Determine Bioremediation of Organic Compounds in the Soil. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies. 2013;2(13):125-8.
16. Wang Q, Zhang S, Li Y, et al. Potential Approaches to Improving Biodegradation of Hydrocarbons for Bioremediation of Crude Oil Pollution. Environ Protection J. 2011;2:47-55.
17. Kumar A, Bisht BS, Joshi VD, et al. Review on Bioremediation of Polluted Environment: A Management Tool. International journal of Environmental Sciences. 2011;1(6):1079-93.
18. Jain PK, Bajpai V. Biotechnology of bioremediation- a review. International journal of environmental sciences. 2012;3(1): 535-49.
19. Montagnolli RN, Matos Lopes PR, Bidoia ED. Assessing Bacillus subtilis biosurfactant effects on the biodegradation of petroleum products. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2015;187(4116):1-17.
20. Sharma S. Bioremediation: Features, Strategies and applications. Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Life Science. 2012;2(2): 202-13.
21. Dell’Anno A, Beolchini F, Rocchetti L, et al. High bacterial biodiversity increases degradation performance of hydrocarbons during bioremediation of contaminated harbor marine sediments. Environ Pollut. 2012;167:85-92.
22. Singh A, Kumar V, Srivastava JN. Assessment of Bioremediation of Oil and Phenol Contents in Refinery Waste Water via Bacterial Consortium. J Pet Environ Biotechnol. 2013;4(3):1-4.
23. Pedro P, Francisco J E, Joao F, et al. DNA damage induced by hydroquinone can be prevented by fungal detoxification. Toxicology Reports. 2014;1:1096-1105.
24. Abdulsalam S, Adefila SS, Bugaje IM, et al. Bioremediation of soil contaminated with used motor oil in a closed system. Bioremediation and Biodegradation. 2013;3:100-172.
25. Safiyanu I, Abdulwahid Isah A, Abubakar US, et al. Review on Comparative Study on Bioremediation for Oil Spills Using Microbes. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences. 2015;6(6):783-90.
26. Sani I, Safiyanu I, Rita S M. Review on Bioremediation of Oil Spills Using Microbial Approach. IJESR. 2015;3(6):41-45.
27. Sarang B, Richa K, Ram C. Comparative Study of Bioremediation of Hydrocarbon Fuel. International Journal of Biotechnology and Bioengineering Research. 2013;4(7):677-86.
28. Erika A W, Vivian B, Claudia C, et al. Biodegradation of phenol in static cultures by Penicillium chrysogenum erk1: catalytic abilities and residual phytotoxicity. Rev Argent Mcrobiol. 2013;44(2):113-21.
29. AI-Jawhari IFH. Ability of Some Soil Fungi in Biodegradation of Petroleum Hydrocarbon. Journal of Applied & Environmental Microbiology. 2014;2(2):46-52
30. Aranda E, Ullrich R, Hofrichter M. Conversion of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, methyl naphthalenes and dibenzofuran by two fungal peroxygenases. Biodegradation. 2010;21(2):267-81.
31. Karigar CS, Rao SS. Role of microbial enzymes in the bioremediation of pollutants: a review. Enzyme Res. 2011;1-11.
32. Hesham A, Khan S, Tao Y, et al. Biodegradation of high molecular weight PAHs using isolated yeast mixtures: application of metagenomic methods for community structure analyses. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2012;19:3568-78.
33. Sivakumar G, Xu J, Thompson RW, et al. Integrated green algal technology for bioremediation and biofuel. Bioresour Technol. 2012;107:1-9.
34. Lin C, Gan L, Chen ZL. Biodegradation of naphthalene by strain Bacillus fusiformis (BFN). J Hazard Mater. 2010;182:771-7.
35. Simarro R, Gonzalez N, Bautista LF, et al. Assessment of the efficiency of in situ bioremediation techniques in a creosote polluted soil: change in bacterial community. J Hazard Mater. 2013;262:158-67.
36. Yadav M, Singh S, Sharma J, et al. Oxidation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons in systems containing water miscible organic solvents by the lignin peroxidase of Gleophyllum striatum MTCC-1117. Environ Technol. 2013;32:1287-94.
37. Hidayat A, Tachibana S. Biodegradation of aliphatic hydrocarbon in three types of crude oil by Fusarium sp. F092 under stress with artificial sea water. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2012;5(1):64-73.
38. Maliji D, Olama Z, Holail H. Environmental studies on the microbial degradation of oil hydrocarbons and its application in Lebanese oil polluted coastal and marine ecosystem. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2013;2(6):1-18.
39. Burghal AA, Abu-Mejdad NMJA, Tamimi WHA. Mycodegradation of Crude Oil by Fungal Species Isolated from Petroleum Contaminated Soil. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology. 2016;5(2):1517-24.
40. El-Borai AM, Eltayeb KM, Mostafa AR, et al. Biodegradation of Industrial Oil-Polluted Wastewater in Egypt by Bacterial Consortium Immobilized in Different Types of Carriers. Pol J Environ Stud. 2016;25(5):1901-9.
41. Sukumar S, Nirmala P. Screening of diesel oil degrading bacteria from petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated soil. Int J Adv Res Biol Sci. 2016;3(8):18-22.
42. Kehinde FO, Isaac SA. Effectiveness of augmented consortia of Bacillus coagulans, Citrobacter koseri and Serratia ficaria in the degradation of diesel polluted soil supplemented with pig dung. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2016;10(39):1637-44.
43. Phulpoto H, Qazi1 M A, Mangi S, et al. Biodegradation of oil-based paint by Bacillus species monocultures isolated from the paint warehouses. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2016;13:125-34.
44. Jasin´ ska A, Rózalska S, Bernat P, et al. Malachite green decolorization by non-basidiomycete filamentous fungi of Penicillium pinophilum and Myrothecium roridum. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2012;73:33–40.
45. Jasin´ ska A, Bernat P, Paraszkiewicz K. Malachite green removal from aqueous solution using the system rapeseed press cake and fungus Myrothecium roridum. Desalin. Water Treat. 2013;1-9.
46. Jasin´ ska A, Paraszkiewicz K, Sip A, et al. Malachite green decolorization by the filamentous fungus Myrothecium roridum – Mechanistic study and process optimization. Bioresource Technology. 2015;194:43-8.
47. Yan J, Niu J, Chen D, et al. Screening of Trametes strains for efficient decolorization of malachite green at high temperatures and ionic concentrations. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2014;87:109-15.
48. Shedbalkar U, Jadhav J. Detoxification of malachite green and textile industrial effluent by Penicillium ochrochloron. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng. 2011;16:196-204.
49. Hassan MM, Alam MZ, Anwar MN. Biodegradation of Textile Azo Dyes by Bacteria Isolated from Dyeing Industry Effluent. Int Res J Biological Sci. 2013;2(8):27-31.
50. Shah MP, Patel KA, Nair SS, et al. Microbial degradation of Textile Dye (Remazol Black B) by Bacillus spp. ETL-2012. J Bioremed Biodeg. 2013;4(2):1-5.
51. Yogesh P, Akshaya G. Evaluation of Bioremediation Potential of Isolated Bacterial Culture YPAG-9 (Pseudomonas aeruginosa) for Decolorization of Sulfonated di-azodye Reactive Red HE8B under Optimized Culture Conditions. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2016;5(8):258-72.
52. Das A, Mishra S, Verma VK. Enhanced biodecolorization of textile dye remazol navy blue using an isolated bacterial strain Bacillus pumilus HKG212 under improved culture conditions. J Biochem Tech. 2015;6(3):962-9.
53. Adebajo SO, Balogun SA, Akintokun AK. Decolourization of Vat Dyes by Bacterial Isolates Recovered from Local Textile Mills in Southwest. Microbiology Research Journal International. 2017;18(1):1-8.
54. Jaysankar D, Ramaiah N, Vardanyan L. Detoxification of toxic heavy metals by marine bacteria highly resistant to mercury. Marine Biotechnology. 2008;10(4):471-7.
55. Chen C, Wang JL. Characteristics of Zn2+ biosorption by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biomed. Enviro Sci. 2007; 20:478–82.
56. Talos K, Pager C, Tonk S, et al. Cadmium biosorption on native Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells in aqueous suspension. Acta Univ Sapientiae Agric Environ. 2009;1:20-30.
57. Infante JC, De Arco RD, Angulo ME. Removal of lead, mercury and nickel using the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Revista MVZ Córdoba. 2014;19:4141-9.
58. Tigini V, Prigione V, Giansanti P, et al. Fungal biosorption, an innovative treatment for the decolourisation and detoxification of textile effluents. Water. 2010;2:550–65.
59. Paranthaman SR, Karthikeyan B. Bioremediation of heavy metal in paper mill effluent using Pseudomonas spp. International Journal of Microbiology. 2015;1:1-5.
60. Peña-Montenegro TD, Lozano L, Dussán J. Genome sequence and description of the mosquitocidal and heavy metal tolerant strain Lysinibacillus sphaericus CBAM5. Stand Genomic Sic. 2015;10(2):1-10.
61. Wu YH, Zhou P, Cheng H, et al. Draft genome sequence of Microbacterium profundi Shh49T, an Actinobacterium isolated from deep-sea sediment of a polymetallic nodule environment. Genome Announcments. 2015;3:1-2.
62. Soleimani N, Fazli MM, Mehrasbi M, et al. Highly cadmium tolerant fungi: Their tolerance and removal potential. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering. 2015;13(19):1-9.
63. Mirlahiji SG, Eisazadeh K. Bioremediation of Uranium by Geobacter spp. Journal of Research and Development. 2014;1:52-8.
64. Priyalaxmi R, Murugan A, Raja P, et al. Bioremediation of cadmium by Bacillus safensis (JX126862), a marine bacterium isolated from mangrove sediments. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2014;3:326-35.
65. Sinha SN, Biswas M, Paul D, et al. Biodegradation potential of bacterial isolates from tannery effluent with special reference to hexavalent chromium. Biotechnology Bioinformatics and Bioengineering. 2011;1(3):381-6.
66. Sinha SN, Paul D. Heavy metal tolerance and accumulation by bacterial strains isolated from waste water. Journal of Chemical, Biological and Physical Sciences. 2014;4(1):812-7.
67. Sinha SN, Biswas K. Bioremediation of lead from river water through lead-resistant purple-nonsulfur bacteria. Global Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2014; 2(1):11-8.
68. Mohamed AT, Hussein AA, Siddig MA, et al. Degradation of oxyfluorfen herbicide by Soil microorganisms: Biodegradation of herbicides. Biotechnol. 2011;10:274-9.
69. Niti C, Sunita S, Kukreja K, et al. Bioremediation: An emerging Technology for remediation of pesticides. Research Journal of Chemistry and Environment. 2013;17(4):88-105.
70. Mónica P, Darwin RO, Manjunatha B, et al. Evaluation of various pesticides-degrading pure bacterial cultures isolated from pesticide-contaminated soils in Ecuador. Afr J Biotechnol. 2016;15(40):2224-33.
71. Hussaini S, Shaker M, Asef M. Isolation of Bacterial for Degradation of selected pesticides. Bull. Environ. Pharmacol Life Sci. 2013;2(4):50-3.
72. Ravi RK, Pathak B, Fulekar MH. Bioremediation of Persistent Pesticides in Rice field Soil Environment Using Surface Soil Treatment Reactor. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2015;4(2):359-69.
73. Mulligana CN, Yong RN. Natural attenuation of contaminated soils. Environment International. 2004;30:587-601.
74. Li CH, Wong YS, Tam NF. Anaerobic biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with amendment of iron (III) in mangrove sediment slurry. Bio resource Technology. 2010;101:8083-92.
75. Niu GL, Zhang JJ, Zhao S, et al. Bioaugmentation of a 4- chloronitrobenzene contaminated soil with Pseudomonas putida ZWL73. Environmental Pollution. 2009;57:763-71.
76. Malik ZA, Ahmed S. Degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons by oil field isolated bacterial consortium. African J Biotechnol. 2012;11(3):650-8.
77. Alwan AH, Fadil SM, Khadair SH, et al. Bioremediation of the water contaminated by waste of hydrocarbon by use Ceratophyllaceae and Potamogetonaceae plants. J Genet Environ Resour Conserv. 2013;1(2):106-10.
78. Gomez F, Sartaj M. Optimization of field scale biopiles for bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated soil at low temperature conditions by response surface methodology (RSM). Int Biodeterior Biodegradation. 2014;89:103-9.
79. Sayler GS, Ripp S. Field applications of genetically engineered microorganisms for bioremediation processes. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 2000;11:286-9.
80. Thapa B, Kumar AKC, Ghimire A. A review on Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants in soil. Kathmandu University. Journal of science, engineering and technology. 2012;8(I):164-70.
81. Jain PK, Gupta VK, Bajpai V, et al. GMO’s: Perspective of Bioremediation. In: Recent Advances in Environmental Biotechnology. Jain PK, Gupta VK, Bajpai V, editors. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing AG and Co. KG: Germany; 2011b; pp. 6-23.
82. Jain PK, Gupta VK, Gaur RK, et al. Fungal Enzymes: Potential Tools of Environmental Processes. In: Fungal Biochemistry and Biotechnology. Gupta VK, Tuohy M, Gaur RK, editors. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing AG and Co. KG: Germany; 2010c; pp: 44-56.
83. Kulshreshtha S. Genetically Engineered Microorganisms: A Problem Solving Approach for Bioremediation. J Bioremed Biodeg. 2013;4(4):1-2.
84. Lee TH, Byun IG, Kim YO, et al. Monitoring biodegradation of diesel fuel in bioventing processes using in situ respiration rate. Water Science and Technology, 53(4-5):263-72.
85. Agarry S, Latinwo GK. Biodegradation of diesel oil in soil and its enhancement by application of Bioventing and amendment with brewery waste effluents as Biostimulation-Bioaugmentation agents. Journal of Ecological Engineering. 2015;16(2):82-91.
86. Delille D, Duval A, Pelletier E. Highly efficient pilot biopiles for on-site fertilization treatment of diesel oil-contaminated sub-Antarctic soil. Cold Reg Sci Technol. 2008;54:7-18.
87. Emami S, Pourbabaee AA, Alikhani HA. Bioremediation Principles and Techniques on Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soil. Technical Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 2012;2(10):320-3.
88. Kumar S, Chaurasia P, Kumar A. Isolation and Characterization of Microbial Strains from Textile Industry Effluents of Bhilwara, India: Analysis with Bioremediation. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research. 2016;8(4):143-50.