Effects of malnutrition
Received: 07-Jan-2022, Manuscript No. PULHPM-22-4133; Editor assigned: 09-Jan-2022, Pre QC No. PULHPM-22-4133(PQ); Reviewed: 20-Jan-2022 QC No. PULHPM-22-4133; Revised: 22-Jan-2022, Manuscript No. PULHPM-22-4133(R); Published: 28-Jan-2022, DOI: 10.37532/pulhpm.22.5(1).5-6
Citation: Dixon G. Effects of malnutrition. J Health Pol Manage. 2022;5(1): 5-6
This open-access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits reuse, distribution and reproduction of the article, provided that the original work is properly cited and the reuse is restricted to noncommercial purposes. For commercial reuse, contact reprints@pulsus.com
Abstract
There is no commonly agreed definition of the term “malnutrition.” It’s been used to define a nutrient deficit, excess, or imbalance that has a detectable negative impact on body composition, function, and clinical outcome. Despite the fact the malnourished people can be both under and equivalent physical, the term ‘malnutrition’ is sometimes used interchangeably with the term malnutrition
Introduction
Malnutrition is a prevalent, under-diagnosed, and under-treated condition that patients and physicians must deal with. It is both a cause and a consequence of disease, and it can be found in both institutional and community settings. Approximately 5% of the UK population is underweight, with a BMI of less than 20 kg/m2 , while obese people who lose weight accidentally and have a BMI within the normal range are also at risk of malnutrition [1]. Other patients are put at risk after an acute incident (such as a small intestinal infarction), leaving them unable to meet their metabolic needs in the short and long term. Malnutrition is at least twofold more common in the elderly and those with chronic diseases, and threefold more common in those living in institutions.
Malnutrition rates in UK hospitals have ranged from 13%-40% during the last 15 years, with many patients seeing a worsening of their nutritional status throughout their stay [2]. In 2008, the British Association of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (BAPEN) performed a major survey that indicated that 28% of inpatients were at risk of malnutrition. The prevalence was higher in certain subpopulations: 34% of all emergency admissions and 52% of admissions from care homes, for example. Malnutrition is still more common in industrial nations in situations of poverty, social isolation, and substance abuse. Most adult malnutrition, on the other hand, is linked to disease and can be caused by: reduced calorie intake, diminished macro- and/or micronutrient absorption, changes in regulations or higher losses, higher energy consumption (in specific disease processes). Reduced food intake is probably the single most important aetiological component in disease-related malnutrition. Changes in cytokines, glucocorticoids, insulin, and insulinlike growth factors are hypothesised to be the cause of decreased appetite sensation [3]. Failure to give regular nutritional meals in an atmosphere where they are protected from routine clinical procedures and where they are offered help and support with feeding when needed may exacerbate the problem in hospital patients. Deficiency is an independent risk factor for weight loss and malnutrition in patients with intestinal failure and those who are having abdominal surgical operations. Patients may experience excessive and/or particular nutrient losses in some circumstances, such as holding pressure fistulae or burns, and their nutritional needs are usually very different from normal metabolism [4]. For many years, it was assumed that increased energy expenditure was the primary cause of disease-related malnutrition. There is now significant evidence that overall energy expenditure in many illness states is actually lower than in normal health. The disease’s basic hyper metabolism is countered by a decrease in physical activity, with studies showing that energy expenditure in critical care patients is typically less than 2,000 kcal/day [5]. Patients with acute trauma, head injury, or burns are an exception, as their energy expenditure may be significantly higher, albeit only for a brief time.
Discussion
Malnutrition effects on almost every organs in the body because of improper uptake of vitamins and nutrition. There immune response is not works properly and we can say its low. In malnutrition, there is a decrease in heart muscle mass. The reduced cardiac output has a knock-on effect on renal function, lowering renal perfusion and glomerular filtration rate. Deficits in micronutrients and electrolytes (e.g., thiamine) can significantly influence heart function, especially after refeeding. Cough pressure and expectoration of secretions are reduced by poor diaphragmatic and respiratory muscle function, prolonging recovery from respiratory tract infections. Immune function is also harmed, raising the risk of infection due to cytokine, complement, and phagocyte dysfunction [6].
Malnourished surgical patients have also been reported to have delayed wound healing. Chronic malnutrition causes alterations in pancreatic exocrine function, intestinal blood flow, villous architecture, and intestinal permeability, all of which are necessary for maintaining GI function. The colon’s ability to reabsorb water and electrolytes is lost, and ions and fluid are secreted in the small and large intestines. This could cause diarrhoea, which has been linked to a high fatality rate in severely malnourished individuals. The most visible indicator of malnutrition is weight loss due to a loss of fat and muscle mass, including organ mass. Muscle function deteriorates before muscle mass deteriorates, implying that nutritional intake has a significant impact independent of muscle mass effects. Similarly, improvements in muscular function occur more quickly with nutrition support than can be explained just by replacement of muscle mass. One possibility for these observations is the rate associated of energy-dependent cellular membrane pumping, often known as reductive adaptation. This can happen after only a few days of fasting. If nutritional intake is insufficient to meet requirements over a longer length of time, the body will draw on functional reserves in tissues including muscle, adipose tissue, and bone, resulting in changes in body composition. Direct repercussions for tissue function develop over time, resulting in a loss of functional capability and a brittle, but stable metabolic state. Injuries like illness and trauma cause rapid decompensation. Importantly, unequal or abrupt increases in energy intake can lead to decompensation and refeeding syndrome in malnourished patients. Malnutrition has psychosocial ramifications as well as physical consequences, such as apathy, sadness, anxiety, and self-neglect [7].
Malnutrition’s effects on physiological function have a significant impact on clinical outcomes. Patients who were hungry or underweight had a higher incidence of postoperative complications and mortality, according to surgeons in the 1930s. This original observation has since been backed up by a slew of investigations. Malnourished surgical patients had three to four times the complication and fatality rates of regularly nourished patients, as well as longer hospital stays and up to 50% higher expenditures [8]. Medical patients, particularly the elderly, have reported similar findings. It can be difficult to distinguish the negative consequences of malnutrition from the underlying disease process, especially when each might be a cause and/or result of the other. However, there is strong evidence that providing nutritional support improves outcomes malnutrition must therefore be diagnosed by screening in these patients. Early identification of patients at risk of malnutrition during hospital admission (or outpatient clinic visits) allows for early nutritional treatment intervention. MUST is a trustworthy and valid strategy for screening patients that is simple, quick, and easy [9].It incorporates current weight Body Mass Index (BMI), history of recent unintentional weight loss, and chance of future weight loss to identify those at risk. Patients who require a more extensive examination and preparation of a personalized progressive care plan by nutrition professional are identified during the screening procedure [10].The simple provision of frequent meals or food with higher nutrition in vulnerable patient groups may be sufficient to manage nutritional risk. Additional steps could include improving menu options or offering feeding help. In patients for whom these ‘social’ measures are insufficient to meet nutritional needs, oral nutritional supplements or enteral tube feeding under dietetic supervision are required. Intrathecal feeding is only used in a small percentage of patients. In most cases, the need for PN arises from an inaccessible or non-functioning GI tract. Inpatients are rescreened at seven-day intervals throughout their hospital stay, alerting clinicians to those who have lost so much weight [11]. As a result of a collaboration between the Department of Health and stakeholders with a stake in nutritional care, the Nutrition Action Plan was released, which outlines key prioritize such as raising awareness, ensuring access to guidance, promoting screening and training, and clarifying standards [12].
Nutritional care has been specified by the Care Quality Commission as one of the basic notions that all acute trusts must meet, however not all providers are reviewed on an annual basis, and patients continue to die as a result of malnourished. As a result, nutritional care has been included in a new regulatory framework for health and social care services that was established in April 2010, assuring that nutrition receives more attention. All hospitals should include a multidisciplinary nutrition support team for handling patients with complex dietary disorders on a local level.
Conclusion
Malnourishment is prevalent and has a wide range of impacts on physiological function, which is often neglected by doctors. It’s linked to higher rates of morbidity and mortality in hospital patients, as well as higher healthcare costs. Implementing a basic screening technique can identify individuals who are at risk and allow for proper treatment, which can improve clinical outcomes and lower healthcare costs. Every doctor should realize that effective nutritional care is essential to excellent clinical practice. Nutritional treatment can be improved significantly by addressing shortages in all health providers’ education and exercising influence through clinical leadership.
REFERENCES
- Stratton RJ, Green CJ, Elia M. Disease-related malnutrition: an evidence-based approach to treatment. Cabi; 2003.
Google Scholar - Elia M, Stratton RJ. How much undernutrition is there in hospitals? British J Nutri. 2000;84(3):257-259.
Google Scholar Cross Ref - Hungry to be Heard: The scandal of malnourished older people in hospital. Age Concern; 2006.
Google Scholar Cross Ref - Warrell DA, Cox TM, Benz EJ, et al. Oxford textbook of medicine. Oxford Univ Press, USA; 2003.
Google Scholar - Elia M. Changing concepts of nutrient requirements in disease: implications for artificial nutrition support. Lancet 1995;345:1279-1284.
Google Scholar Cross Ref - Green CJ. Existence, causes and consequences of disease-related malnutrition in the hospital and the community, and clinical and financial benefits of nutritional intervention. Clin Nutrit. 1999;18:3-28.
Google Scholar Cross Ref - Jackson AA, Warrell DA, Cox TM, et al. Severe malnutrition. In: Oxford textbook of medicine. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press. 2003.
Google Scholar - Elia M, Russell CA, editors. Combating malnutrition: Recommendations for action. A report from the Advisory Group on Malnutrition. London: BAPEN. 2009.
Google Scholar - Saunders J, Smith T. Malnutrition: causes and consequences. Clin Med. 2010;10(6):624.
Google Scholar Cross Ref - Nutrition Action Plan Delivery Board: end of year progress report. London: DH, 2009.
Google Scholar - Kopelman P, Lennard-JJ. Nutrition and patients: A doctor's responsibility. Clini Med. 2002;2(5):391.
Google Scholar Cross Ref - Department of Health and the Nutrition Summit Stakeholder Group Improving nutritional care: A joint action plan from the Department of Health and Nutrition Summit Stakeholder group. 2007.
Google Scholar