Prostate health and male hormones
- *Corresponding Author:
- Dr JB Gajewski
5991 Spring Garden Road, Suite 620, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 1Y6
Tel: 902-425-3940
Fax: 902-422-0033
E-mail: jgajew@is.dal.ca
Keywords
Prostatic carcinogenesis; Prostatic hormones; Serum markers; Digital rectal examination; Prostate biopsy; Prostate-specific antigen testing
Prostatic Carcinogenesis and Hormones
The etiology of carcinoma of the prostate is unclear; however, several risk factors, such as race, positive family history [1] and diet, have been identified. The disease is more common in black than white men [2]. A diet rich in fructose and low in calcium promotes the hydroxylation of vitamin D, which has antitumour properties (3). An increased intake of vegetables, especially tomatoes, is inversely associated with the incidence of prostate cancer [4]. Selenium intake also has a protective property against prostate cancer [5]. Soy protein, which is a phytoestrogen, has an estrogen-like effect on the prostate [6].
Androgen receptors (AR) are widely present in the prostate and are normally activated by androgen binding. In the prostate, types 1 and 2 5-alpha-reductases convert testosterone to dehydrotestosterone. The dehydrotestosterone-AR complex is more stable than the testosterone-AR complex. Androgens may influence serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, increase prostate size and obstructive symptoms, and activate occult prostatic malignancy [7]. In clinical settings, these changes are very minimal and not statistically different from those in untreated hypogonadal men [8]. There is no evidence to date that serum sex hormones promote prostate cancer [9]. The above observation is, however, based on short term observations (of up to three years of follow- up), and hence, prostate cancer has a long, natural history in which the role of androgens in the activation of prostate cancer remains unclear.
Castration results in the involution of the prostate and apoptosis. Androgen-deprivation therapy decreases PSA and testosterone levels. The effect on serum testosterone extends beyond the cessation of treatment and may last as long as seven months [10]. Estrogens modulate androgenic effects on prostate tissue and decrease serum testosterone levels [11].
Apoptosis and tumour suppressor genes are now considered to be the primary mechanisms of prostate cancer development [12], and genes such as Tp53, p21WAF1/CIP1, Bcl-2, PTEN/MMAC1 and p73 have been implicated in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer.
Serum Markers and Digital Rectal Examination
PSA testing was introduced into clinical practice in the 1980s and has dramatically changed the management of prostate cancer since then. It is an invaluable tool in the detection, staging and monitoring of prostate cancer. PSA analysis is the best single test for the detection of early prostate cancer. Using the upper limit of normal of 4.0 ng/mL, the PSA test has a sensitivity of 67.5% to 80% [13]. Approximately 20% of all prostate cancer is found in men with PSA levels lower than 4.0 ng/mL [14]. The probability of detecting prostate cancer is about 25% if the PSA level is 4 to 10 ng/mL [15]. When the PSA level is greater than 10 ng/mL, the probability of cancer detection increases to 60%. To improve the detection of prostate cancer and avoid unnecessary biopsies, several different PSA tests, such as PSA density (PSA value/ volume of prostate), PSA velocity (greater than 0.75 ng/mL per year), age-specific PSA and transitional zone PSA density, have been suggested. Only the age-specific PSA reference range (Table 1) is clinically useful [16].
Age range (years) | Reference range (ng/mL) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Asian men | Black men | White men | |
40 to 49 | 0 to 2.0 | 0 to 2.0 | 0 to 2.5 |
50 to 59 | 0 to 3.0 | 0 to 4.0 | 0 to 3.5 |
60 to 69 | 0 to 4.0 | 0 to 4.5 | 0 to 4.5 |
70 to 79 | 0 to 5.0 | 0 to 5.5 | 0 to 6.5 |
Table 1: Age-adjusted, prostate-specific androgen values by ethnic group
PSA exists in serum in either bound (complexed) or unbound (free) form. Free PSA ranges from 5% to 50% of total PSA. Patients with prostate cancer have a lower fraction of free PSA compared with the bound fraction. Men with total PSA levels between 4 to 10 ng/mL and ratios of free to total PSA greater than 20% to 25% have a significantly lower risk of prostate cancer on biopsy [17]. The cut-off value of free to total PSA at 25% increases the sensitivity and specificity of detecting prostate cancer to 95% and 20%, respectively. In men with total PSA levels less than 4.0 ng/mL, the free PSA measurement is uncertain.
Prostate cancer, benign prostatic hypertrophy and prostatitis my cause PSA levels to rise. Physical activity, infection, urinary retention and some medications may also influence PSA levels. Prostatic needle biopsy and digital rectal examination (DRE) may cause a transient elevation in free and total PSA levels. Finasteride (Proscar, Merck Frosst Canada, Canada), a 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor, decreases PSA levels by 50% on average [18]. Some herbal prostate compounds can also lower PSA levels.
Human kallikrein 2 is a newly discovered prostate marker in which 80% of amino acid sequences are identical to those of PSA [19]. It is more prostate tumour-specific. Future clinical trials will show if this new marker is more useful.
The use of DRE results alone have a poor predictive value in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (16%) and considerably understage the extent of prostate cancer. DRE, however, has a large influence in combination with PSA and age ranges on the probability of positive biopsy (51%) [20,21].
Early detection of prostate cancer using PSA and DRE findings should be offered to men older than age 50 years, men at high risk (ie, those with a positive family history and and/or an African-American ethnic background) and men older than age 40 years who have at least a 10-year life expectancy [22].
Canadian Urological Association guidelines read: “The digital rectal examination (DRE) and prostate specific antigen (PSA) measurements increase the early detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Men should be aware of the potential benefits and risks of early detection so they can make an informed decision as to whether to have this test performed”.
Prostate Biopsy
The only test that confirms the presence of prostate cancer is a prostate biopsy, which is usually performed using transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guidance. Overall, the staging accuracy of solely using TRUS results is 58%. A TRUS biopsy is indicated if a patient has elevated PSA levels or an abnormal DRE result. Prostate biopsy may improve clinical staging. The number of biopsies that are needed for adequate sampling is still controversial, but sextant biopsy is now used in standard practice [23]. Sextant biopsy, however, has a false-negative rate of 23% to 31% [24].
Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is a pathological diagnosis of histological changes, which are abnormal but not yet malignant. PIN has a high predictive value as a histological marker for prostate cancer. Prostate cancer has been diagnosed in 35% of men with PIN versus 13% of those in a control group [25].
Conclusions
Andropause has a profound effect on prostate function, even though many mechanisms related to testosterone and prostate physiology are unclear. The most worrisome aspect in andropause evaluation is prostate cancer, which is an absolute contraindication for androgen treatment. Patients contemplating testosterone replacement therapy should have prostate screening (DRE and PSA measurement) before initiating therapy and then at six-month intervals. Men with abnormal DRE or PSA findings, or those with the presence of PIN on biopsy are not suitable for this treatment.
References
- Bauer JJ, Srivastava S, Connelly RR, et al. Significance of familial history of prostate cancer to traditional prognostic variables, genetic biomarkers and recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Urology 1998;51:970-6.
- deVere White RW, Deitch AD, Jackson AG. Radical differences in clinically localized prostate cancers of black and white men. J Urol 1998;159:1979-83.
- Giovannucci E, Rimm EB, Wolk A, et al. Calcium and fructose intake in relation to risk of prostate cancer. Cancer Res 1998;58:442-7.
- Giovannucci E, Ascherio A, Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Willett WC. Intake of carotenoids and retinal in relation to risk of prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87:1767-76.
- Giovannucci E. Selenium and risk of prostate cancer. Lancet 1998;352:755-6.
- Moyad MA. Soy, disease prevention and prostate cancer. Semin Urol Oncol 1999;17:97-102.
- Svetec DA, Canby ED, Thompson IM, Sabenegh ES Jr. The effect of parental testosterone replacement on prostate specific antigen in hypogonadal men with erectile dysfunction. J Urol 1997;158:1775-7.
- Douglas TH, Connelly RR, McLeod DG, Erickson SJ, Barren R 3rd, Murphy GP. The effect of exogenous testosterone replacement on prostate-specific antigen and prostate-specific membrane androgen levels in hypogonadal men. J Surg Oncol 1995;59:246-50.
- Nomura A, Heilbrun LK, Stemmermann GN, et al. Prediagnostic serum hormones and the risk of prostate cancer. Cancer Res 1998;48:3515-7.
- Nejat RJ, Rashid HH, Bagiella E, Katz AE, Benson MC. A prospective analysis of time to normalization of serum testosterone after withdrawal of androgen deprivation therapy. J Urol 2000;164:1891-4.
- Coffey D, Berry S, Ewing L. An overview of current concepts in the study of benign prostatic hyperplasia. In: Rogers CH, Coffey DS, Cunha GR, Grayhack JT, Hinmanf, Horton R, eds. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia II. Washington: United States Department of Health and Human Services, NIH Publication no 87-2881, 1987.
- Burton JL, Oakley N, Anderson JB. Recent advances in the histopathology and molecular biology of prostate cancer. Br J Urol 2000;85:87-94.
- Brawer MK. Prostatic-specific antigen: Current status. CA Cancer J Clin 1999;49:264-81.
- Richie JP, Catalona WJ, Ahmann FR, et al. Effect of patient age on early detection of prostate cancer with serum prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination. Urology 1993;42:365-4.
- Catalona WJ, Richie JP, Ahmann FR, et al. Comparison of digital rectal examination and serum prostate-specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer: Results of multicentre clinical trial of 6,630 men. J Urol 1994;151:1283-90.
- Richardson TD, Oesterling JE. Age-specific reference range for serum prostate-specific antigen. Urol Clin North Am 1997;24:339-51.
- Vashi AR, Wojno KJ, Henricks W, et al. Determination of the “reflex range” and appropriate cutpoints for percent free prostate-specific antigen in 413 men referred for prostatic evaluation using the AxSYM system. Urology 1997;49:19-27.
- Andriole GL, Guess HA, Epstein JI, et al. Treatment with finasteride preserves usefulness of prostatic-specific antigen in detection of prostate cancer: Results of a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled clinical trial. PLESS Study Group. Proscar Long-Term Efficacy and Safety Study. Urology 1998;52:195-202.
- Young CY, Andrews PE, Montgomery BT, Tindall DJ. Tissue-specific and hormonal regulation of human prostate-specific glandular kallikrein. Biochemistry 1992:31:818-24.
- Luboldt HJ, Bex A, Swoboda A, Husing J, Rubben H. Early detection of prostate cancer in Germany: a study using digital rectal examination and 4.0 ng/mL prostate-specific antigen cutoff. Eur Urol 2001;39:131-7.
- Potter SR, Horniger W, Tinzle M, Bartsch G, Partin AW. Age, prostate-specific antigen, and digital rectal examination as determinants of probability of having prostate cancer. Urology 2001;57:1100-4.
- Thompson I, Carroll P, Coley C, et al. The PSA best practices policy of the American Urological Association. Am Urol Assoc Update Ser 2001;20:65-72.
- Stamey TA. Making the most out of six systematic sextant biopsies. Urology 1995;45:2-12.
- Rabbani F, Stroumbakis N, Kava BR, Cookson MS, Fair WR. Incidence and clinical significance of false-negative sextant prostate biopsies. J Urol 1998;159:1247-50.
- Davidson D, Bostwick DG, Qian JQ, et al. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is a risk factor for adenocarcinoma: Predictive accuracy in needle biopsies. J Urol 1995;154:1295-9.
- *Corresponding Author:
- Dr JB Gajewski
5991 Spring Garden Road, Suite 620, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 1Y6
Tel: 902-425-3940
Fax: 902-422-0033
E-mail: jgajew@is.dal.ca
Abstract
Andropause has a profound effect on prostate function, even though many mechanisms related to testosterone and prostate physiology are unclear. The most worrisome aspect in andropause evaluation is prostate cancer, which is an absolute contraindication for androgen treatment. Early detection of prostate cancer using prostate-specific androgen (PSA) measurement and digital rectal examination (DRE) findings should be offered to men at high risk (those with a positive family history and/or of African- American ethnic background) who are older than 40 years of age and who have at least a 10-year life expectancy. Patients contemplating testosterone replacement therapy should have prostate screening (DRE and PSA measurement) before initiating therapy and then at six-month intervals. Men with abnormal DRE or PSA findings, or those with the presence of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasa on biopsy are not suitable for this treatment.
-Keywords
Prostatic carcinogenesis; Prostatic hormones; Serum markers; Digital rectal examination; Prostate biopsy; Prostate-specific antigen testing
Prostatic Carcinogenesis and Hormones
The etiology of carcinoma of the prostate is unclear; however, several risk factors, such as race, positive family history [1] and diet, have been identified. The disease is more common in black than white men [2]. A diet rich in fructose and low in calcium promotes the hydroxylation of vitamin D, which has antitumour properties (3). An increased intake of vegetables, especially tomatoes, is inversely associated with the incidence of prostate cancer [4]. Selenium intake also has a protective property against prostate cancer [5]. Soy protein, which is a phytoestrogen, has an estrogen-like effect on the prostate [6].
Androgen receptors (AR) are widely present in the prostate and are normally activated by androgen binding. In the prostate, types 1 and 2 5-alpha-reductases convert testosterone to dehydrotestosterone. The dehydrotestosterone-AR complex is more stable than the testosterone-AR complex. Androgens may influence serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, increase prostate size and obstructive symptoms, and activate occult prostatic malignancy [7]. In clinical settings, these changes are very minimal and not statistically different from those in untreated hypogonadal men [8]. There is no evidence to date that serum sex hormones promote prostate cancer [9]. The above observation is, however, based on short term observations (of up to three years of follow- up), and hence, prostate cancer has a long, natural history in which the role of androgens in the activation of prostate cancer remains unclear.
Castration results in the involution of the prostate and apoptosis. Androgen-deprivation therapy decreases PSA and testosterone levels. The effect on serum testosterone extends beyond the cessation of treatment and may last as long as seven months [10]. Estrogens modulate androgenic effects on prostate tissue and decrease serum testosterone levels [11].
Apoptosis and tumour suppressor genes are now considered to be the primary mechanisms of prostate cancer development [12], and genes such as Tp53, p21WAF1/CIP1, Bcl-2, PTEN/MMAC1 and p73 have been implicated in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer.
Serum Markers and Digital Rectal Examination
PSA testing was introduced into clinical practice in the 1980s and has dramatically changed the management of prostate cancer since then. It is an invaluable tool in the detection, staging and monitoring of prostate cancer. PSA analysis is the best single test for the detection of early prostate cancer. Using the upper limit of normal of 4.0 ng/mL, the PSA test has a sensitivity of 67.5% to 80% [13]. Approximately 20% of all prostate cancer is found in men with PSA levels lower than 4.0 ng/mL [14]. The probability of detecting prostate cancer is about 25% if the PSA level is 4 to 10 ng/mL [15]. When the PSA level is greater than 10 ng/mL, the probability of cancer detection increases to 60%. To improve the detection of prostate cancer and avoid unnecessary biopsies, several different PSA tests, such as PSA density (PSA value/ volume of prostate), PSA velocity (greater than 0.75 ng/mL per year), age-specific PSA and transitional zone PSA density, have been suggested. Only the age-specific PSA reference range (Table 1) is clinically useful [16].
Age range (years) | Reference range (ng/mL) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Asian men | Black men | White men | |
40 to 49 | 0 to 2.0 | 0 to 2.0 | 0 to 2.5 |
50 to 59 | 0 to 3.0 | 0 to 4.0 | 0 to 3.5 |
60 to 69 | 0 to 4.0 | 0 to 4.5 | 0 to 4.5 |
70 to 79 | 0 to 5.0 | 0 to 5.5 | 0 to 6.5 |
Table 1: Age-adjusted, prostate-specific androgen values by ethnic group
PSA exists in serum in either bound (complexed) or unbound (free) form. Free PSA ranges from 5% to 50% of total PSA. Patients with prostate cancer have a lower fraction of free PSA compared with the bound fraction. Men with total PSA levels between 4 to 10 ng/mL and ratios of free to total PSA greater than 20% to 25% have a significantly lower risk of prostate cancer on biopsy [17]. The cut-off value of free to total PSA at 25% increases the sensitivity and specificity of detecting prostate cancer to 95% and 20%, respectively. In men with total PSA levels less than 4.0 ng/mL, the free PSA measurement is uncertain.
Prostate cancer, benign prostatic hypertrophy and prostatitis my cause PSA levels to rise. Physical activity, infection, urinary retention and some medications may also influence PSA levels. Prostatic needle biopsy and digital rectal examination (DRE) may cause a transient elevation in free and total PSA levels. Finasteride (Proscar, Merck Frosst Canada, Canada), a 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor, decreases PSA levels by 50% on average [18]. Some herbal prostate compounds can also lower PSA levels.
Human kallikrein 2 is a newly discovered prostate marker in which 80% of amino acid sequences are identical to those of PSA [19]. It is more prostate tumour-specific. Future clinical trials will show if this new marker is more useful.
The use of DRE results alone have a poor predictive value in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (16%) and considerably understage the extent of prostate cancer. DRE, however, has a large influence in combination with PSA and age ranges on the probability of positive biopsy (51%) [20,21].
Early detection of prostate cancer using PSA and DRE findings should be offered to men older than age 50 years, men at high risk (ie, those with a positive family history and and/or an African-American ethnic background) and men older than age 40 years who have at least a 10-year life expectancy [22].
Canadian Urological Association guidelines read: “The digital rectal examination (DRE) and prostate specific antigen (PSA) measurements increase the early detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Men should be aware of the potential benefits and risks of early detection so they can make an informed decision as to whether to have this test performed”.
Prostate Biopsy
The only test that confirms the presence of prostate cancer is a prostate biopsy, which is usually performed using transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guidance. Overall, the staging accuracy of solely using TRUS results is 58%. A TRUS biopsy is indicated if a patient has elevated PSA levels or an abnormal DRE result. Prostate biopsy may improve clinical staging. The number of biopsies that are needed for adequate sampling is still controversial, but sextant biopsy is now used in standard practice [23]. Sextant biopsy, however, has a false-negative rate of 23% to 31% [24].
Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is a pathological diagnosis of histological changes, which are abnormal but not yet malignant. PIN has a high predictive value as a histological marker for prostate cancer. Prostate cancer has been diagnosed in 35% of men with PIN versus 13% of those in a control group [25].
Conclusions
Andropause has a profound effect on prostate function, even though many mechanisms related to testosterone and prostate physiology are unclear. The most worrisome aspect in andropause evaluation is prostate cancer, which is an absolute contraindication for androgen treatment. Patients contemplating testosterone replacement therapy should have prostate screening (DRE and PSA measurement) before initiating therapy and then at six-month intervals. Men with abnormal DRE or PSA findings, or those with the presence of PIN on biopsy are not suitable for this treatment.
References
- Bauer JJ, Srivastava S, Connelly RR, et al. Significance of familial history of prostate cancer to traditional prognostic variables, genetic biomarkers and recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Urology 1998;51:970-6.
- deVere White RW, Deitch AD, Jackson AG. Radical differences in clinically localized prostate cancers of black and white men. J Urol 1998;159:1979-83.
- Giovannucci E, Rimm EB, Wolk A, et al. Calcium and fructose intake in relation to risk of prostate cancer. Cancer Res 1998;58:442-7.
- Giovannucci E, Ascherio A, Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Willett WC. Intake of carotenoids and retinal in relation to risk of prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87:1767-76.
- Giovannucci E. Selenium and risk of prostate cancer. Lancet 1998;352:755-6.
- Moyad MA. Soy, disease prevention and prostate cancer. Semin Urol Oncol 1999;17:97-102.
- Svetec DA, Canby ED, Thompson IM, Sabenegh ES Jr. The effect of parental testosterone replacement on prostate specific antigen in hypogonadal men with erectile dysfunction. J Urol 1997;158:1775-7.
- Douglas TH, Connelly RR, McLeod DG, Erickson SJ, Barren R 3rd, Murphy GP. The effect of exogenous testosterone replacement on prostate-specific antigen and prostate-specific membrane androgen levels in hypogonadal men. J Surg Oncol 1995;59:246-50.
- Nomura A, Heilbrun LK, Stemmermann GN, et al. Prediagnostic serum hormones and the risk of prostate cancer. Cancer Res 1998;48:3515-7.
- Nejat RJ, Rashid HH, Bagiella E, Katz AE, Benson MC. A prospective analysis of time to normalization of serum testosterone after withdrawal of androgen deprivation therapy. J Urol 2000;164:1891-4.
- Coffey D, Berry S, Ewing L. An overview of current concepts in the study of benign prostatic hyperplasia. In: Rogers CH, Coffey DS, Cunha GR, Grayhack JT, Hinmanf, Horton R, eds. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia II. Washington: United States Department of Health and Human Services, NIH Publication no 87-2881, 1987.
- Burton JL, Oakley N, Anderson JB. Recent advances in the histopathology and molecular biology of prostate cancer. Br J Urol 2000;85:87-94.
- Brawer MK. Prostatic-specific antigen: Current status. CA Cancer J Clin 1999;49:264-81.
- Richie JP, Catalona WJ, Ahmann FR, et al. Effect of patient age on early detection of prostate cancer with serum prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination. Urology 1993;42:365-4.
- Catalona WJ, Richie JP, Ahmann FR, et al. Comparison of digital rectal examination and serum prostate-specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer: Results of multicentre clinical trial of 6,630 men. J Urol 1994;151:1283-90.
- Richardson TD, Oesterling JE. Age-specific reference range for serum prostate-specific antigen. Urol Clin North Am 1997;24:339-51.
- Vashi AR, Wojno KJ, Henricks W, et al. Determination of the “reflex range” and appropriate cutpoints for percent free prostate-specific antigen in 413 men referred for prostatic evaluation using the AxSYM system. Urology 1997;49:19-27.
- Andriole GL, Guess HA, Epstein JI, et al. Treatment with finasteride preserves usefulness of prostatic-specific antigen in detection of prostate cancer: Results of a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled clinical trial. PLESS Study Group. Proscar Long-Term Efficacy and Safety Study. Urology 1998;52:195-202.
- Young CY, Andrews PE, Montgomery BT, Tindall DJ. Tissue-specific and hormonal regulation of human prostate-specific glandular kallikrein. Biochemistry 1992:31:818-24.
- Luboldt HJ, Bex A, Swoboda A, Husing J, Rubben H. Early detection of prostate cancer in Germany: a study using digital rectal examination and 4.0 ng/mL prostate-specific antigen cutoff. Eur Urol 2001;39:131-7.
- Potter SR, Horniger W, Tinzle M, Bartsch G, Partin AW. Age, prostate-specific antigen, and digital rectal examination as determinants of probability of having prostate cancer. Urology 2001;57:1100-4.
- Thompson I, Carroll P, Coley C, et al. The PSA best practices policy of the American Urological Association. Am Urol Assoc Update Ser 2001;20:65-72.
- Stamey TA. Making the most out of six systematic sextant biopsies. Urology 1995;45:2-12.
- Rabbani F, Stroumbakis N, Kava BR, Cookson MS, Fair WR. Incidence and clinical significance of false-negative sextant prostate biopsies. J Urol 1998;159:1247-50.
- Davidson D, Bostwick DG, Qian JQ, et al. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is a risk factor for adenocarcinoma: Predictive accuracy in needle biopsies. J Urol 1995;154:1295-9.