Previous Page  3 / 11 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 3 / 11 Next Page
Page Background

Page 28

Notes:

Volume 3

Journal of Nursing Research and Practice

Nursing & Pediatrics 2019

February 25-26, 2019

February 25-26, 2019 | London, UK

5

th

World Congress on

Neonatology and Pediatrics

World Congress on

Nursing Research and Evidence Based Practice

&

The effect of an unfolding case study on critical thinking, knowledge acquisition, and handoff

communication in baccalaureate nursing students

Antionella Upshaw

Southern University and A&M College, USA

Statement of the Problem:

Miscommunication during handoffs at time of transition for the older adult often results in hospital

readmissions. Researchers report that handoff communication (HOC) is a critical responsibility and varies in educational methods

creating a latent patient safety risk; therefore, it is imperative that nurses be educated and trained in how to communicate. The

unfolding case study (UCS) is increasingly being used to promote critical thinking and improve communication, but the lack of

evidence to guide educational practice limits the use in nursing programs. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of an

UCS teaching pedagogy on critical thinking, knowledge acquisition and HOC.

Methodology & Theoretical Orientation:

A quasi-experimental study design examined the effect among seventy-one (71)

baccalaureate nursing students. The basic tenets of Social Constructivism were utilized to guide the research. Students were asked to

complete pre- and post-test questionnaires in Health Education Systems, Inc. (HESI) custom exam, Handoff-Clinical Examination

(CEX), and Health Sciences Reasoning Test (HSRT). The UCS using pre-clinical activities, faculty training, communication

workshop, and debriefing was conducted over a two-week period. The Solomon four-group meta-analysis approach was used to

determine the effect of the UCS on learning outcomes before and after the educational intervention and implementation of the

Introduction, Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation (ISBAR) standardized tool.

Findings:

No significant differences between the treatment and control groups on knowledge acquisition, HOC, and critical thinking

were observed. A positive correlation was found (r (70) = .322, p<.05), indicating a relationship between knowledge acquisition and

critical thinking. Participants exposed to the UCS had higher mean Handoff-CEX provider and receiver performance scores than

participants who had been exposed to the traditional case study. Findings supported the basic tenet of Social Constructivism in that

students learn by doing rather than observing in a social context.

antionella_upshaw@subr.edu

J Nursing Research and Practice

Volume 3