Previous Page  9 / 17 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 9 / 17 Next Page
Page Background

Page 45

Current Research: Integrative Medicine

October 16-17, 2017 Chicago, USA

Yoga and Physiotherapy Congress

Yoga and Physiotherapy 2017

Efficacy of polarized light versus shock wave in the treatment of pressure ulcer

Ehab Abdelhafeez Abdealmaged

Cairo University, Egypt

Background:

In clinical practice, many wounds are slow to heal and difficult to manage and so, this study was

performed to compare the efficacy of polarized light versus shock wave in the treatment of pressure ulcer.

Methodology:

Thirty patients were included in this study. Their ages ranged from 40 to 60 years and were

randomly divided into two groups, each group containing 15 patients: Group (A) received traditional medical

treatment and polarized light, three days/week for eight weeks. Group (B) received treatment with shock wave

therapy plus traditional medical treatment, one session/week for eight weeks. The measurements were done

before the study and after eight weeks of treatment for both groups by using wound surface area tools (tracing

method) and epithelialisation rate (ER).

Results:

It showed reduction in wound surface area after treatment for groups (A) and (B), with percentage of

50%, 40.58% respectively and for epithelialisation rate there was a significant increase in ER of group (A) post

treatment compared to group (B) as 52.14%, 42.24% respectively.

Conclusion:

Both polarized light and shock wave had the same significant effect on pressure ulcers healing with

high significant improvement in epithelialization rate using polarized light than shock wave therapy.

dr.ahmedmohey88@yahoo.com