Students understand and participate in nursing research
Received: 31-May-2022, Manuscript No. PULJNRP-22-5098; Editor assigned: 04-Jun-2022, Pre QC No. PULJNRP-22-5098(PQ); Accepted Date: Jun 16, 2022; Reviewed: 09-Jun-2022 QC No. PULJNRP-22-5098(Q); Revised: 12-Jun-2022, Manuscript No. PULJNRP-22-5098(R); Published: 17-Jun-2022, DOI: 10.37532/2632-251X.2022.6(6).104-6
Citation: Sharma D. Students understand and participate in nursing research. J Nurs Res Pract. 2022;6(6):104-106.
This open-access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits reuse, distribution and reproduction of the article, provided that the original work is properly cited and the reuse is restricted to noncommercial purposes. For commercial reuse, contact reprints@pulsus.com
Abstract
Evidence-based medicine In talks on patient care, the term "research" is frequently used. Nursing/midwifery as a profession has a responsibility to teach their students with a primary focus on research-based practise. Evaluation is a crucial component in education that determines what and how students chose to study, and learning is generally based on the quality of assessment. The usage of a learning log is one prominent way for supporting learning and assessment. This article discusses the usage of a learning log as a learning and assessment tool for undergraduate nursing and midwifery students, as well as reflective comments from students and module leaders. The instructors' ambition to be innovative when teaching a research module drove the use of a learning record lesson to students who frequently believe that research is a difficult and unpleasant subject to study.
Key Words
Learning log; Research; Student; Undergraduate; Nursing/ midwifery education.
Introduction
The utilization of evidence (i.e. research) is the core of nursing/midwifery practice, yet it is challenging to educate student in reastudents in research language and practice. A positive attitude toward research is crucial in educating pupils; otherwise, knowledge and utilization would be limited. While understanding evidence and its application in practice is important, students find learning about research tough and demanding. As a result, research as a subject ranks lower than other disciplines on the curriculum and is not often regarded as therapeutically relevant. Students have expressed a lack of interest in research as a subject, despite the fact that research helps guide practice improvements and evidence-based practice. Undergraduate curriculum should include research content to help students comprehend the research process and the importance of evidence-based practice. With this in mind, the second author (module leader) set the task of integrating their students in the topic matter, participating in courses and tutorials, and being interested in researching and thinking critically about the issue beyond the prescribed reading. With this in mind, the second author (module leader) set the task of integrating their students in the topic matter, participating in classes and tutorials, and being engaged in researching and thinking critically about the issue in a way that goes beyond the required reading [1]. This is consistent with worldwide professional nursing/midwifery associations, which state that preregistration education is essential. This is consistent with international professional nursing/midwifery bodies, which state that pre-registration education programmers should equip students with the skills to analyze, think critically, solve problems, and reflect.
Conscious of this, and in order to prepare students for their encounters with a multifaceted, ever-changing healthcare environment, the second author created a formative and summative assessment (present knowledge and a learning log) tailored to a research module as part of an undergraduate course. Students from the intellectual disability, mental health, general nursing, and midwifery programmers (n=120) composed the student group. Nursing/midwifery is the foundation of health care and it should be strengthened through regulation, management, teaching, and research. Research must be understood as a continuous process in which educators enhance instructional practices that emphasize the vital relationship between research and practice. As a result, research must be communicated in a comprehensible manner to practitioners. Due to limited exposure to research applications in clinical practice, undergraduate students are uninterested in research. Students must recognize the significance of research and be required to engage in research throughout their curriculum in order to be enthused about it [2]. In general, research modules only give students with the "tip of the iceberg," and once completed students must continue to expand their competence and knowledge of applying the research process. Creating a blended learning strategy should make module content more meaningful, connect theory to practice, and make the module more accessible to a wide range of learning styles [3]. However, in order to develop effective approaches for integrating evidence-based practice into the curriculum, it is critical to understand the different sources of evidence that students use, how retrieving evidence can be problematic, students' knowledge and attitudes toward evidence-based practice, and their current use of evidence-based practice, as well as what is preventing students from undertaking projects. What is preventing students from engaging in project work where they can confront a clinically relevant subject, uncover evidence to support it, and implement the findings? Students, on the other hand, usually anticipate research to be a tough subject to grasp, and educators' duty is to combine the appropriate aspects to engage the student [4]. Computer technology, collecting information, conducting research, and critical thinking abilities have all been identified as essential for evidence-based practice. As a second-year undergraduate student on the BSc four-year nursing degree programme, i completed a research module using a learning log as a means of assessment. The assignment required me to create a learning journal that reflected my experience through the research process [5]. The courses' goal was to advance understanding, attitude, and skills in critically reviewing research literature and applying it to practise, as well as to promote an appreciation of the impact research has on practise. I had never used a learning log before, so it provided me with the opportunity to learn about the research process in a novel and original approach [6]. I was concerned about the topic area when I started this module because it was new to me as a subject, even though the concept of evidence-based and research-informed knowledge had been ingrained throughout our modules and practise placements up until that point. My issue stemmed from the fact that there were many new concepts and ideologies to learn that I did not believe were clearly relevant to patient care. Another cause of concern was that we might select a methodology to fame our learning from a predetermined list developed by the module leader. All of these approaches were unfamiliar to me, and I indicated my difficulty in making a decision [7]. This prompted a group debate and consensus that the module leader would either assign or utilise a lottery system to assign each student a methodology [8]. We concluded as a group that a lottery approach looked the most equitable because we were all in a similar circumstance. The assigned methodology was then used and applied to the module learning during the study process to investigate its use in nursing/midwifery as well as its implementation and utilisation in practice [9]. The first objective was to undertake a formative evaluation of a 500 word document summarising my thoughts and ideas about the approach used in the research process. The research process phases might be utilised as predetermined headers here, and other headings were encouraged if applicable [10].
Discussion
However, research continues to be a challenging subject to teach since many students fail to understand research terminology and are unable to grasp the notion of research and recognize its value and link to practice. The importance of educators having a positive attitude, research expertise, a solid theoretical foundation, and excitement for making learning exciting in teaching research cannot be overstated. Thus, the adoption of innovative teaching methods and research expertise helps to preserve credibility and aids students. However, there are challenges in overcoming cultural and abstract obstacles to research in order to build students' self-confidence in their ability to understand and apply research in their work. These barriers, as well as the difficulty in engaging and communicating to students the relevance and fundamental role of research in professional practice, can be discouraging. As a first step, we must cultivate a love of research and a desire to understand how research relates to real-world practice. Not only by teaching a research module, but also by infusing evidence-based practice ideas across the curriculum and cultivating a spirit of inquiry in students as they progress through their education. Because approaches to teaching research can influence students' views, educators play an important role in students' development of evidence-based practice, knowledge, skill, and coordination.
These barriers, as well as the difficulty in engaging and communicating to students the relevance and fundamental role of research in professional practise, can be discouraging. As a first step, we must cultivate a love of research and a desire to understand how research relates to real-world practise. Not only by teaching a research module, but also by infusing evidence-based practise ideas across the curriculum and cultivating a spirit of inquiry in students as they progress through their education. Because approaches to teaching research can influence students' views, educators play an important role in students' development of evidence-based practise, knowledge, skill, and coordination. One of the most important components of advancing student learning is to create a structure for students to thoroughly reflect on their learning process throughout their programme and to build their abilities, skills, and habits developed via critical reflection. While research is the lifeblood of any profession, research findings are critical in our efforts to be evidencebased and provide high-quality care. The sheer volume of new knowledge and terminology might be daunting. Nonetheless, rather than students adhering to current clinical practise contexts, we need to develop students' capability and confidence in questioning current clinical practise. When students lack knowledge, confidence, or expertise in regard to research components of evidence-based practise, they will conform of evidence-based practise or are opposed to using research in clinical practise. To address this, we need nurses and midwives to be adept in a variety of activities, including detecting knowledge gaps, rapidly locating appropriate literature, and evaluating research evidence. Engaging students in evidence-based practise and research allows them to develop an acceptance of the importance of evidence-based practise and care, promote research knowledge, skills and motivate and cultivate an interest in and acceptance of evidence-based practise and research that will become rooted in their practise and last beyond registration. This is critical because evidence-based practise is associated with clinical governance, safe and effective decision-making, and increased transparency and accountability. Using a learning log as a form of evaluation offered several advantages, including strengthening students' abilities and awareness of research and how it might improve care within the health service, resulting in evidence-based practise. In order to provide quality care, nurses/midwives must use evidence to inform the development and improvement of policies and practices.
Conclusion
As a result, nurses/midwives must build research competency as they engage with evidence and gain new information to guide practise throughout their careers. Furthermore, nurses/midwives must learn to translate best evidence into their practise in order to influence the treatment offered, its quality, and its cost effectiveness. As a result, nursing/midwifery achieves its mission of providing evidence-based care that promotes quality outcomes for patients, families, healthcare professionals and the system. However, we must assure adequate evidence application in everyday practise because there will always be a research practice gap between publication and practise adoption, which could range from 10 years to 30 years.
REFERENCES
- Blumenshine P, Egerter S, Barclay CJ, et al. Socioeconomic disparities in adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2010;39(3):263-272.
[Crossref] [ Google Scholar ]
- Freeman MK, Schrimsher RH, Kendrach MG. Student perceptions of online lectures and WebCT in an introductory drug information course. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006;70(6):
- Feder G, Eccles M, Grol R. Clinical guidelines: using clinical guidelines. BMJ 1999; 318(7):728-730.
- Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A. Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ 1999;318(5):527-530.
- Oxman AD, Fretheim A, Schunemann HJ. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: introduction. Health Res Policy Syst. 2006;4(12):1475-4505. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
- Kearns LE, Shoaf JR, Summey MB. Performance and satisfaction of second-degree BSN students in Web-based and traditional course delivery environments. J Nurs Educ. 2004;43(6):280‐284.
- Saillour-Glenisson F, Michel P. [Individual and collective facilitators of and barriers to the use of clinical practice guidelines by physicians: a literature review]. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2003;51(1):65-80.
- Grilli R, Lomas J. Evaluating the message: the relationship between compliance rate and the subject of a practice guideline. Med Care. 1994;32(3):202-13.
- Chang HYA. The urgent needs for communication with patients about the use of complementary and alternative medicine. J Nurs Res Pract. 2017;1(1): 1.
- Masule LS, Amakali K, Wilkinson W. Best practice in cardiac rehabilitation for patients after heart valve repair or replacement surgery in Namibia: A literature review. J Nurs Res Prac. 2021; 5(7):1-3.