Previous Page  8 / 10 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 8 / 10 Next Page
Page Background

Page 40

Volume 2

Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health Research

Psychiatry Nursing & Psychiatry 2019

June 17-18, 2019

Psychiatry & Mental health Nursing

Psychiatry and Mental Health

June 17-18, 2019 | Rome, Italy

4

th

World Congress on

2

nd

Global Experts Meeting on

&

Evaluating the use of multi-disciplinary team meeting sheets in older adult & adult

mental health in a tertiary psychiatric hospital in NHS Grampian, North Scotland

2019- a completed audit cycle

Sanah Ghafoor

Clinical Effectiveness Team, UK

Multidisciplinary care is common practice, although not uniform, throughout the country according to

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence(NICE). Practical implementation of multi-disciplinary care

is variable across different wards and is vital for effective communication and planning of patient care.

Multi-Disciplinary Team(MDT) meeting sheets were implemented in the Mental Health Service in NHS

Grampian following recommendations from an adverse event report involving a suicide in 2012. After the

initial audit, a further cycle was completed and the loop closed in 2019.

Aims were to evaluate whether attendance at the meeting was multi-disciplinary, evaluate the level of

completion of paperwork and to evaluate whether errors are documented appropriately. Method employed

included utilising a data collection tool created by the Clinical Effectiveness Team on the Older Adult and

Adult Mental Health wards over the course of one week in 2019.

Results showed an improvement in the use of MDT sheets across both Older Adult and Adult Mental Health

from n=18 to n=78 (a 77% increase), improved written documentation of changes (89% in previous audit

vs 99% in 2019), who was responsible for making those changes (61% vs 69%), an improvement in patient

identifiable information (67% vs 99%) and written evidence of staff members and designation present at the

meeting (89% vs 96%). Areas requiring improvement identified include legibility (94% vs 81%), accuracy of

recording errors and signature/designation (94% vs 90%/78% vs 76%) of staff on MDT sheet.

The recommendations were discussed at the Audit & Clinical Effectiveness Meeting in the Mental Health

Service in NHS Grampian. These included typing/writing in capital letters to improve legibility, providing

education via email/at handover on accuracy of recording errors and finally promoting joint medical & nursing

responsibility for signing and completing paperwork. Further re-auditing once changes are implemented may

be required.

J Psych and Mental Health Research, Volume 2