Previous Page  2 / 15 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 2 / 15 Next Page
Page Background

Page 27

Notes:

Volume 2

Journal of Molecular Cancer

Breast Cancer & Vascular Conference 2019

February 25-26, 2019

February 25-26, 2019 London, UK

Joint event on

World Congress on

Breast Cancer

Vascular Biology & Surgeons Meeting

5

th

International Conference on

&

Mammographic Breast Density: Its role in tumor size assessment with imaging techniques

Izquierdo M

Dexeus University Hospital, Spain

Aim:

To study the visual and automatic measurement of mammographic breast density (MBD) and its implications in tumor size

assessment using distinct imaging techniques.

Methods:

Study of the visual and automaticmeasurement ofmammographic breast density according to the breast imaging data system

(BI-RADS) in 212 patients with invasive unifocal breast cancer, excluding microinvasive lesions, who did not receive neoadjuvant

chemotherapy. Tumor size assessment was compared using a linear regression according pathologic size with mammographic, US

and MR size. The influence of MBD in each technique of pathologic size was seen by Bland-Altman plot.

Results:

Patient’s mean age was 55,7

9.9 year-old. The mean size of the lesion stablished by mammography was 16.8

10.4 (4 -70)

mm, by US was 13.6

7.2 (5 – 55) mm and by MR 17.2

9.9 (5 – 66) mm. Mean pathologic size was 12.6

8.1 (0.3 – 55) mm. Automatic

MBD mean was 25.2

16.78. BIRAD assessment with visual and automatic MBD measurements were correlated with a tendency of

tumor size overestimation with visual method. Linear regression of tumor size according image techniques with pathologic size

showed an adjusted r-square of 27.3% for mammography 41.8% for US and 51.7% for MR. The best correlation was seen with MR

although has a tendency to overestimate tumor size. Only tumor size assessed by mammography was influenced by MBD. With this

technique, tumor size was best adjusted for those breasts with lower MBD.

Conclusion:

Visual measurement overestimates MBD versus automatic measurement according BIRADS categories. MR is the more

accurate breast imaging technique for assessing tumor size independently of the BMD which only influences in the mammographic

tumor size estimation.

Biography

Maxim Izquierdo is an expert in the Breast Disease committee of Dexeus Universitary Hospital, Barcelona. He has presented his news in the Gallen International

BCC; European Breast Cancer Conference; ASCO; and World Congress of Senologic .International Society, He is member of Sociedad Española Senologia

Patologia Mamaria.

maxizq@dexeus.com

Izquierdo M, J Molecular Cancer

Volume 2